May 4, 2009

Clark Fork River clean-up is scheduled to begin this year on the Trestle Area and Eastside Road in Deer Lodge. CFRTAC will play a constructive role informing and engaging the public about these remediation and restoration efforts. Last Fall, CFRTAC hosted a public educational session in Deer Lodge and we are working with EPA and DEQ to arrange another this Spring.

In March, CFRTAC met with state officials and Powell County Commissioners to discuss the upcoming Clark Fork River clean-up. DEQ explained results of Deer Lodge’s Trestle Area sampling it conducted last fall. The Trestle Area is a special concern as it will continue to see much foot traffic especially from children that use the area to cross the river to and from school each day as well as an area to play on a hot summer day. Powell County emphasized that the area will see increased recreation once a trail is built and voiced concerns about whether contamination will be unearthed. The commissioners want a permanent solution and the process to move forward. They requested a public meeting to address the Clark Fork River clean-up and announce results of Trestle sampling to the public and news media.

And while there is considerable public interest in seeing this project move forward, the effort may be stalled by disagreements between state agencies and the EPA on how to interpret the ROD and proceed with the work. CFRTAC is encouraging EPA, DEQ, and NRDP to resolve these issues in a timely fashion so as not to miss another construction season. A meeting is set for May 21, in Helena with CFRTAC convening and facilitateing these talks. One of CFRTAC’s roles in the Superfund process is to work together with the regulatory agencies.

The Clark Fork River deserves remediation to begin this year in order to continue its recovery. Delaying efforts further is unacceptable. The clean-up is long overdue. The communities and river have been living with mining contamination for over 100 years. The negotiations between EPA, ARCO and the state took over 25 years. Differences between the state and EPA must be settled so the clean-up can continue. There are areas on Eastside Road and at the Trestle that are human health hazards. To delay addressing these areas is to ignore the primary functions of these environmental agencies: protecting the health of people through protection of their environment.



Clark Fork Perspectives: Silver Bow Creek Cleanup Jeopardized

The following commentary is from CFRTAC volunteer Pat Munday, one of the organizers of the Rally Round the Creek educational forum held in Butte in April. That event was spurred by concerns that stormwater runoff in Butte through old mine wastes is re-contaminating downstream work that's been completed at Silver Bow Creek.

Rust never sleeps: that is an important lesson that citizens who care about the environment have learned about Superfund cleanup and restoration.

The state of Montana, which has the lead role on the Silver Bow Creek Superfund site, has done a fantastic job of cleaning up and restoring the corridor. Just a few years ago, it was a lifeless and blighted place-toxic to fish, plants, and people. Today, the area downstream of Butte is an inviting place. The Greenway public trail will officially open soon. A few trout have been showing up in the creek, too, and rumors are that some intrepid angler caught a trophy.

We cannot, however, take the restored Silver Bow Creek for granted. The three million dollar per mile project is threatened by contaminated run-off from the Butte Hill. The origins of Silver Bow Creek are buried in toxic mine waste, resulting in polluted groundwater that - given the current remedy - will need to be treated forever. Though most of this groundwater is captured and effectively treated before being discharged, surface water pollution still finds its way to the creek.

Although the Record of Decision for the "Butte Priority Soils Operable Unit" remedy was signed more than two years ago, it is stalled in the so-called Consent Decree process. In the Consent Decree, the parties - Arco-BP, EPA, and Montana - must come to an agreement about how the remedy will be implemented. The Record of Decision was vague, and could allow a whole series of trial-and-error strategies that might take twenty years to stop polluting Silver Bow Creek.

There are some simple solutions that are likely to be effective-such as capturing polluted runoff in a settling and treatment basin. Perhaps such simple solutions should be tried sooner rather than later if that is what it takes to protect the creek. Remember, we have spent $63 million dollars thus far on cleaning up the creek and its floodplain. Let's protect that investment.

Silver Bow Creek's recovery has begun, as evidenced by trout and other fishes found in recent surveys. We know that one day our stream can be returned to a self-sustaining wild trout fishery and a wonderful place for Butte families and visitors to recreate.

But environmental restoration does not just happen. Unless the remedies for Butte and the creek that runs through it are coordinated, things could get worse. Agencies such as Montana's Department of Environmental Quality want to do the right thing, but it's always easier for government to do the right thing when people actively support that choice.

It's your creek. Wade in, and help make a difference.

With the dam and the majority of the sediments removed, remediation at the Milltown Superfund site winds down, while restoration work continues to gear up along the Clark Fork and Blackfoot Rivers.

Read more ...

By the end of this year, the Superfund cleanup at Milltown will be mostly finished and restoration activities will take center stage.

Read more ...

This summer state contractors will be gathering site-specific details to determine how best to implement the Clark Fork River cleanup, which could see on-the-ground-work begin in 2010.

Read more ...

Go to top